Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

--- reference:system-architecture:address-editing-and-query-api [2025/08/27 06:27] – [3. Technical requirements] runarbe
+++ reference:system-architecture:address-editing-and-query-api [2025/08/27 06:33] (current) – runarbe
@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 ====== Address Editing and Query API ======
+This API provides methods to interact with the core addressing data model such as creating, reading, updating and deleting address objects as well as querying them and keeping them in sync with application data and external copies/cached data.
 ===== 1. Integration with Third-Party GIS Platforms =====
@@ Line 27: / Line 28: @@
 This structure aims to enhance the National Addressing System's functionality, supporting accurate and efficient data management and integration across various platforms.
+==== 3.1 Performance Management, Rate Limiting, Caching, and Developer Enablement ====
-==== 3.2 Performance Management, Rate Limiting, Caching, and Developer Enablement ====
 To ensure reliable, scalable, and fair access to the NAS API ecosystem—particularly as integrations expand to include both public and private third-party systems—the platform should adopt additional operational controls and developer support mechanisms:
-==== 3.3 Rate Limiting and Caching ====
+==== 3.2 Rate Limiting and Caching ====
 The NAS API layer will benefit from the implementation of rate limiting to prevent abuse, ensure equitable resource allocation, and protect backend systems from overload during periods of high demand. Rate limiting policies will be clearly defined in API documentation and enforced per API client or token, with the flexibility to grant higher limits to critical government and infrastructure partners.
@@ Line 38: / Line 38: @@
 Complementing rate limiting, API-level caching mechanisms (e.g., in-memory caches, reverse proxies, or CDN-based edge caching) will be deployed to accelerate the most frequently accessed data and reduce repeated queries to the primary database. Caching strategies will be tailored according to data volatility and use-case, balancing data freshness against system responsiveness.
-==== 3.4 Service Level Agreements (SLAs) for Integrations ====
+==== 3.3 Service Level Agreements (SLAs) for Integrations ====
 For all external integrations, especially those with business-critical third-party systems, formal Service Level Agreements (SLAs) will be established. SLAs will define key parameters such as guaranteed uptime, target response times, maintenance notification windows, and escalation procedures for incidents. This transparency fosters trust among stakeholders and ensure predictable quality of service for mission-critical operations.
-==== 3.5 Performance Benchmarks and Scalability Thresholds ====
+==== 3.4 Performance Benchmarks and Scalability Thresholds ====
 To guide system sizing and support future growth, the NAS API and underlying infrastructure will be subject to regular performance benchmarking. Metrics such as average and 95th percentile response times, throughput under load, and maximum supported concurrent connections will be documented. Scalability thresholds (e.g., API requests per minute, data volume limits, user concurrency) will be specified and reviewed as usage patterns evolve.
-==== 3.6 Sandbox Environments for Integration Testing ====
+==== 3.5 Sandbox Environments for Integration Testing ====
 To facilitate secure and efficient onboarding of new integrators, a sandbox environment—mirroring the production API but operating on test data—will be provided to registered developers. This environment enables third parties to prototype and validate their integrations without risk to production data or services. Comprehensive API documentation, test credentials, and sample data will be made available within the sandbox to accelerate development and troubleshooting.